What comes first: Chicken or egg?

 

Humanity has so far failed to express its clear position on the question of "whether chicken comes first or egg comes first."

People who make excuses for being busy making ends meet, even if they are the case. 

What about, philosophers and scientists who have a job in thinking can't answer.

However, only a few people are said to have made various metaphysical inferences from dialectical materialistic perspectives, such as that the original appearance of a chicken may not be what we know under the proposition, "Everything changes and develops." 

However, these arguments have broken the dichotomous absolute theory of 'this or that' but have not solved the problem, listing only ideas.

Also, according to scientific analysis, the process of chickens laying eggs, and eggs becoming chickens again is endless, and so far the most advanced scientific research suggests that eggs are first, but there is no solid evidence to support them.

There are so many simple problems that humans can't even think of when they can send spacecraft to the moon.

But the question is different, and the question of "What is the truth?" and "Who am I?" is no different.

Also, the dichotomous approach of the world is not right, as if it is an attempt to divide the head and legs separately and force them to adjust again. 

There are many roads in the world, and they end up going the same way. The taste of seawater is the same in Germany, in Korea, or anywhere else in the world.

In other words, before the question of "chicken or egg?" "Who are you?" me, the chicken, and the egg are connected.

If you fall into the shape of a chicken, an egg, or "I," or one of them, then you're all separate.

But if you don't follow that shape, for example, a model of a chicken and an egg, and a doll that made me a model, these three models and one picture of those three models with a camera.

Let's take a look at something.

Even the background of the models in the picture is contained in one sheet without boundaries.

However, if you listen to each model that divides it one by one, the distinction is clear.

For us, three-dimensional models can feel more realistic than a picture of everything on a plane without boundaries.

But we can't be completely alone without everything in the world or the background. 

Either a thick wall should be the background, or there should be a dark background in the turned-off room.

In other words, without an observer, the objects to be observed, such as chickens and eggs, cannot exist alone.

So at the beginning of every question there is always me, so chasing those questions only adds to the question and there is no conclusion.

Zen has a saying, "A dog chases a lump of earth thrown, but a lion chases a person who throws a lump of earth."

Will you waste your life following the play of fancy words? Or will you find one true "this"?